Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95
The legendary Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 is perhaps at the pinnacle of camera lens engineering and was released in 2008 to replace the already legendary Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0. The f0.95 Nocti is the fastest brightest most expensive Leica lens in current production (that I am aware of) and is also surrounded by the most hype.
I own some nice lenses but I buy mostly second hand. My most expensive lens purchase to date was my Nikkor 200mm f2 AI-s. A new Noctilux f0.95 costs almost 4x more than what I spent on the 200f2 so it was safe to say I would not be buying one any time soon. That said I longed to try this Noctilux magic so I ordered myself the older cheaper Leica Noctilux 50f1.0
The 50f1 had not yet arrived and I was teaching a photography and lighting workshop in London last weekend with model Katie. Phil who joined us for the day kindly offered me the use of his Leica Noct 50 f0.95 and I jumped at the chance! I lent him my Leica Summicron 90mm f2 and we were all set.
Here are some sample images that I took during the workshop with my Leica M9. Photos are with available light only using the 50mm f0.95 at f0.95. We fitted a 3 stop ND filter (ND0.9) as the conditions were bright yet I was only interested in using it at f0.95 (wide open).
And a comparison photo headshot taken with the Leica Summilux ASPH 50mm f1.4 on the M9 (different day, French model Valentine)
First impressions of the Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95, in no order,
- Long focus through (takes a long time to focus from 1m to infinity)
- Sharp wide open at f0.95 (edge to edge without pixel peeping)
- Little or no noticeable flare
- Clip highlights (overexposed highlights) easily as what you get in the photo is often brighter than you visualise with your eyes
- 1m minimum focus distance is not near enough (vs the Leica Summilux ASPH 50mm f1.4 at 0.7m) for my taste and is the biggest drawback for me
- Good for half body photos but not as good as the 90mm f2 Cron for headshots
- Better results in low contrast light (out of direct sun) (nicer images for my taste)
- Requires a 3 stop ND filter to use in bright conditions if using wide open
- f0.95 DOF at 1m was not noticeable more shallow than then Lux ASPH 50 at 0.7m (by eye)
- f0.95 DOF at 1m appeared less shallow than the Cron 90 f2 at 1m (by eye)
- Easy enough to nail focus at f0.95 if the subject is static
Is the Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 better than the Leica Summilux ASPH 50 1.4?
I think for the additional expense of the Nocti I rather have a Lux ASPH 50f1.4
+ a Cron 90mm f2.
Is the Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 better than the Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0?
We will have to wait to see. As soon as my 50 f1 arrives I will be testing it straight away and I can then post some comparisons.
If money was no object would I chose to shoot with the Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 over any of my other Leica lenses? Probably yes! ..unless travelling with weight restrictions. The shallow DOF at f0.95 can make any scene appear more beautiful that what would be seen with the naked eye.
Do I prefer the Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 or the Nikkor 200mm f2 AI-s?
I prefer the Leica 50 f0.95 mostly due to the size. I think the 200f2 is slightly sharper wide open but both give near edge to edge sharpness at their widest aperture. The 200f2 gives greater subject background separation but then it is a much much larger lens!
I feel very lucky to have had the opportunity to both test this amazing lens and also to now be able ot compare it to the older cheaper Noctilux f1. Coming soon!
MatthewOsbornePhotography.co.uk – Leica Wedding Photographer
Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0 (pre-arrival hype) – https://matthewosbornephotography.wordpress.com/2014/04/25/leica-noctilux-50/