Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 vs f1.0

Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 vs f1.0
MatthewOsbornePhotography – Leica Photographer

Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 vs f1.0

I recently treated myself to a 1981 Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0 v2. After now having the Nocti f1 a few weeks I have used it to shoot an entire wedding (Alexa & Rich in Warwickshire) and for a recent model photography / fashion shoot. It quickly became my favourite lens and the enjoyment it gives is in proportion to the high price tag. I use it at it widest aperture for everything and use ND filters if conditions are too bright to do so. I love how the older Noctilux draws and the low contrast soft looking images it produces. They are soft but still more than usuable for female portraiture.

Here are a few recent example images using the Leica M9 + 50mm f1.0
(All are Leica M9 in camera basic black and white JPEGs)
Leica vs Mamiya RZ!
Leica M9 B&W JPEG
Leica High Key Portrait
Noctilux Portrait

Leica B&W JPEG
Leica Fashion Photography

Leica M9 DNG B&W Conversions (as comparison – added after)

Leica M9 + Noctilux

Leica M9 B&W

On my last London Portrait Photography Workshop I was lucky enough to be able to borrow a copy of the latest Noctilux 50mm f0.95. The lens is sharp at f0.95 and has a look similar to the Leica Summilux ASPH 50mm f1.4 that I own. Here are example using the Nocti 50mm f0.95 on my M9 (M9 DNG files converted to B&W)
Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 Test Shot
Leica Noctilux f0.95
Portrait Photography Workshop
Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 Portrait
Leica Noctilux f0.95

So. Which lens do you prefer? Most ‘normal’ photographers that are striving for the highest possible sharpness and resolution, call it ‘perfection’ will probably chose the new Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95. I am not the norm and without doubt chose the older Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0 but for its ‘imperfection’.

Before I discovered photography (at the end of 2009) I used to channel my creativity into painting (watercolours on paper and acrylics on model figures). I think this partly is the reason why I enjoy arty less perfect photography such as soft focus images from the Nocti f1 and the imperfections captured when shooting film.

Here is some colourful bokeh from the Noctilux 50mm f1 at last weekends wedding. Wedding post to follow.

Leica Noctilux Bokeh

..it’s funny. I now own quite a few Leica mount lenses and I used to struggle to decide for each shoot what lens to use and if going out for a day which lenses to pack to take with me. Now I would be happy to go out for the day with one lens and never feel like I am missing out. I have the opposite problem of not wanting to take the Nocti 50mm f1 off the camera! 🙂


Author: matthewosbornephotography

Coventry, UK studio based Model and Wedding Photographer offering both Medium Format Film and Digital Images. 1-2-1 Photography and Lighting Tuition also available.

20 thoughts on “Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95 vs f1.0”

  1. Pompous pointless bullshit. This lens is a paintbrush, this lens is a pencil. They are both just another fast 50mm for boring bokeh snaps.

    So you like the softer lens. Good news it means you could go down to a car boot sale and buy an old film and a 50mm kit lens and get the same look.

    Great! I just save you a couple of grand. Yeah, you might not be able to go around impressing your buddies with an exotic lens, but you’d have enough money to actually do something interesting instead of polish your lens collection.

    How about this, how about you just be honest with yourself. This article is just about you justifying to yourself your indulgent and ultimately pointless purchase of an overpriced lens.

    If you had that money to blow on photography, you should have spent it on something that would actually make your photography better, like a trip to somewhere interesting to photograph. Taking time off your job to assist a bette photographer. Maybe build a darkroom and go to work learning some real photography skills?

    1. Hi Dave, thanks for your thoughts. I use a mixture of car boot equivalent Russian film gear and other more expensive makes. You will find there is not much info online about these 2 50s so I thought I’d share some examples. The paintbrush thing might not be the best way to describe it but some lenses are soft and unusable and some I like the look of. Sorry this is just per my taste. Thanks Matt

      1. Props on a very cogent reply to a frankly rude and unnecessarily hostile comment Matthew.

        I’ve followed your photography for a considerable time now and have always admired your enthusiasm and willingness to share your findings.

        I know that you’ve shot great images with old Russian cameras, the relatively modest Bessas and all sorts of lenses from cheap to highly prized.

        Whilst I’ve never come close to spending this sort of money on a lens myself, I can appreciate that these are heart over head purchases and that there’s little sense in actually trying to justify the price (something that you’ve not tried to do here). I was really interested to see your findings and I appreciated you taking the time to share them here.

        Why anyone would waste time bashing is beyond me. Fair enough to share an opinion of course, but the reply also shows an ignorance to your body of work.

        I think far from being a boring bokeh series, I see careful consideration of staging, background, depth across the frame and a dreamy, unique look more akin to something shot on a fast 4×5 than full frame digital.

        The noctiluxes are unique lenses, there’s no doubt in my mind about that.

        Wonderful series, among the very best you’ve shared and I hope you keep doing so.

        – James

  2. Thanks, Matthew, for sharing this info and the beautiful photos. I, too, have the 1.0 and have been wondering whether I need to step up to the 0.95. You’ve helped me decide NOT to buy the 0.95.

    I had trouble focusing the 1.0 wide open with my M9, so I sold my M9 and bought a Sony A7r to use it on, and I am very pleased with the results. I have many other fine Zeiss and Nikkor lenses in different focal lengths which I use on my Nikon D800e, but the Sony/Nocti combo is my favorite. I now use the Sony/Nocti combo for over 90% of my shots. I’m so happy with the “Leica look” from the Noctilux that I’m now considering selling all of my other photo gear and stepping up to a Leica S2 and just one lens.

    As for Dave, I’m sure he has plenty of beautiful images that he has made with his gear, but I don’t think anyone is making him read your website. Perhaps he should spend his time doing “something that would actually make [his own] photography better” instead of leaving nasty comments on someone’s else’s personal website. Different strokes for different folks.

    1. Thanks Gene. I got myself a Leica f1.4x viewfinder magnifier which helps focusing the Nocti when a subject is further away and using the M9. Like you I have a D800 (none e) and I prefer the way Leica photos look to the extent my D800 has more or less retired.

      An S2 and 1 lens sounds a great next step for you though I will stay with Leica Ms for now.

      And Dave, I am guessing he has spent his money paying for trips somewhere interesting to photograph or maybe building a darkroom and now he wishes he’d done like me saved up to buy a Leica Noctilux instead.

      Each to their own. 😉

  3. To me, the Lux 1.0 gives the look and feel that so many photographers are trying to copy by buying Lightroom and Photoshop plugins. This lens gives you that without having to spend time in the digital darkroom. I also think the Leica B&W jpegs out of camera are filmic and rather pleasing.
    The converted DNG’s look like converted DNG’s, if you get my meaning, with the Lux 0.95 pics looking even more so. Most modern lenses and cameras produce images that are so perfect, they lack soul to my eye. The only photography I’ve ever been willing to spend my hard earned money on is a photograph taken in the 1040’s by Barry Goldwater (former US Senator for Arizona).

    As far as the value of a lens, or any photography equipment, I always include the pleasure I get from using that equipment into the equation. I love my Hasselblad 500C. I get joy out of using it, regardless of whether or not the image quality is better than another choice. That joy I get has value beyond the ability of the camera to produce an image I might also enjoy. By contrast, I have never felt that same amount of joy using a Contax 645; a camera that you produced wonderful work with. So I would not be willing to pay more for a Contax even though it would probably produce “better” pictures on a more consistent basis.

    I enjoy your work, am grateful for your willingness to put it out there, and hope I can catch a workshop or meet up if I’m ever in the UK.


    1. Thanks Chris.

      Yes I am very pleased with the SOOC B&W JPEGs using the Noctilux on the M9 and I agree the DNG files have a slightly more CMOS look with the increased dynamic range and all. I also agree with you regarding the Contax 645. Yes it can produce beautiful shallow DOF images but the experience of making the images was far less enjoyable vs. older more manual film cameras such as the Kiev 88 (ARAX-CM) and newer Mamiya RZ67.

      You are welcome to join me for a workshop if you are ever visiting th UK!


  4. Hi Matthew! Congratulations on your gorgeous images. I could not disagree more with the troll you so gracefully dealt with. I am am M/ Nocti .95 owner/user/lover and have suffered a lot from ranters – usually other photographers who’s judgement comes across as more pathetic than poignant. What’s the big deal? Chevy or Ford? Who cares? Why be so mean? If you truly love photography there is as much to appreciate in pinhole as perfected post-production, medium-format as well as iphonography. As Alfred Stieglitz once wrote “Just keep going…”

  5. I shoot weddings, portraits and events with a leica m9 and a sony a7r on a double strap, switching the following leica M lenses 50 noctilux f1, 50 cron f2, 35 cron f2 and wate 16,18,21. The noctilux is by far my favourit lens and I use it for about 75% of my images. It has its limitations for sure but I cannot get over the dreamy manner in which it renders images. It’s a little easier to focus with the a7r, focus peaking + pixel zoom, yet I prefer the rendering and color on the m9. I’ve never shot either camera in jpg with the noctilux

    1. I agree Vincent, my Nocti has been away in Germany for about 12 weeks but back now and it makes everything look beautiful whether on the analogue Leica M3 or the digital M9. Like you I enjoy using it for weddings and the majorrity of my model photography. Great lens. 🙂

  6. Thank you for your hardwork. And despite the risk of inviting abuse. The f1.0 Noctilux reminds me of the Canon 50 mm 0.95 ‘Dream Lens’.

  7. Nice writeup, Matthew, and wow at the reply to the first comment…you handled yourself like a real pro. I love your work and your taste in these exotic lenses, you know how to make them sing.

  8. Hi Matthew,

    nice photos and nice comparison between the Noctis.
    I used to work with the 0,95 and the 1,0 as well and finally I did the same as you – I kept and still keep the old 1,0 lady. Why? Because I like this lens so much; the character and the feeling you can catch with this lens are amazing. (Chris Froelich describe the same thinking here) The camera I am using most of the time is the Monochrom and here – I THINK – this is a perfect match. Yes, the old lady is not that sharp and clean as the new one but what means sharpness in photography? It is good to see and read that there are more people who still beleive inthe magic of photography.

    1. Hi thanks for taking the time to write and my apologies for my slow reply. Yes even today I still sometimes prefer the ‘imperfections’ of the old Noctilux f1.0 to some of my modern rendering lenses like the Leica Summicron 75mm f2 APO and Leica Summilux 50mm f1.4 ASPH. Each have their place. I prefer the Lux and the 75 APO for their closer focusing as much as anything. I think the Nocti helps give digital more of a filmic look and a look that is unlike most digital photos. For me that can only be a good thing! I see why you use in on your Monochrom and I use it on my old M8 for a similar ‘vintage’ look but also on my M240 to make photos look less perfect. Happy shooting! Matt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s