Kodak Ektar vs Kodak Portra Film: Portraits

Kodak Ektar 100 vs Kodak Portra 160/400: Film Portraits

Matthew Osborne Photography

Black and white film

My love for film photography is growing day by day after recently buying a 35mm Leica M3 and Fuji GF670 Pro to add to my collection.  To date I have shot perhaps 85% black and white film vs. only 15% colour film.  I like black and white as depending on how you develop the film you can make some nice high contrast images with a broad dynamic range.  High contrast can give increased apparent image sharpenss so B&W photos tend to look sharper than those in colour.  B&W tones tend to be more flattering for portrait photos and I also develop the negatives at home myself so it’s both economical and easy.  I tend to shoot mostly Kodak T-Max 100 B&W film and push it to ISO 200/400/800 if needed without issue.

Colour film

For 35mm film I use Kodak Portra 160 and for medium format film normally Kodak Portra 400 and more recently Fuji Pro 400H again.  Kodak Portra is said to produce the best skin tones and I did agree but now I am starting to prefer the pinky-green tones of Fuji Pro 400H vs yellow-orange tones of Portra.  35mm Kodak Portra 160 is much cheaper than 135 Fuji Pro 400 and sadly Fuji Pro 160NS is only available in 120 format (not 35mm).

Film Portraits – Wedding Portraits

Medium format 120 ISO 400 film such as Portra is plenty sharp enough for wedding portraits when shot with a lens wide open.  This is especially apparent when using sharp camera lenses such as the Contax 645 + Zeiss 80mm f2 or Fuji GF670 Pro.  135 Portra 160 however to me is almost too soft at wide apertures even when using sharp lenses such as a Leica Summilux ASPH 50mm f1.4 on my Leica M2 or Carl Zeiss Pancolar 80mm f1.8 on my Nikon FM.

Film Portraits – Fashion Photography

120 Kodak Ektar 100 film is very  sharp when used with good cameras/ lenses.  It is almost unflatterringly sharp for female portraits for anything other than perfect model skin.  However if you look deeper you can pull positives from this situation.  To date I have only shot Kodak Ektar 120 film with sharp lenses stopped down.  I try to use sharp lenses for film photography as images tend to be softer than when shooting digital.  If 120 Ektar is almost too sharp for medium format portraits then it will also give me sharper 35mm portraits.  If I find 35mm Ektar is great for sharp fashion portraits using modern ASPH and APO lenses but not very flattering for wedding portraits then I can just use older Leica lenses such as the Noctilux 50mm f1, Summarit 50mm f1.5 or Summaron 35mm f3.5 for a softer photo.

Kodak Ektar vs Kodak Portra Skin Tones and Saturation

Kodak Portra is often the benchmark to aspire to for both film and digital cameras when it comes to natural skin tones.  I have raved about it in the past and wrote a post on it.  The less saturated Portra colours can really suit wedding photography hence it’s popularity (along with Fuji Pro 400H).  When I shoot digital I only shoot in colour if I think colour adds to an image (or it is requested by a paying client such as a wedding).  Portra colours are subtle so perhaps don’t do a colourful scene justice.  Kodak Ektar however is a more saturated colourful film that can be too much for some portrait images taken in a coloured light such as next to a tungsten lamp.  That said if the colours are considered and used as a creative element in the photo you then have a set of fine grain vibrant images to give a splash of colour against the B&W photos.  If the Ektar skin tones are too much in some photos I can simply reduce the saturation a little when scanning the negatives.  I much rather capture more detail with a finer grain film and desaturate (if needed) than try to sharpen softer negatives scans and increase saturation (if desired).

Film Ordered

As a result of my thinking I have ordered a pack of 135 Kodak Ektar 100 film to try in my Leica M3 for model photography / fashion portraits initially.  If I like the results then I might load some Kodak Ektar for my next wedding.  I will share the results and my thoughts once I have some sample images.  For now below are some samples using some of the film types I have talked about.

Available Light

It is worth noting that ISO 100 speed Ektar requires more ambient light hence Portra 400 and Fuji Pro 400H films are more popular for weddings photography.  Portra and 400H also have greater lattitude so cope better for under/ over exposure vs Ektar.  For my model photography and also some wedding photography this is not a problem if I am using off camera speedlights to boost light levels.  It can actually be a benefit on a bright day if I want to shoot at wide apertures like f1.0, f1.2 or f1.2 as film cameras tend to have a slower maximum shutter speed of 1/1000 (Leica M2/ M3), 1/400 (Mamiya RZ 67), 1/500 (Fuji GF670) vs digital 1/4000 (M9), 1/8000 (Nikon D800)

Example Images – Colour Film Photography

135 Kodak Portra 160

Leica M2 Portrait

Leica M2 Photography

Zeiss 80mm f1.8 Pancolar

Leica M2 Wedding

120 Kodak Portra 400

Mamiya RZ Wedding Photography

Fuji GF670 + Portra Portrait

Contax 645 Wedding Portrait

Contax 645 Wedding Portrait

120 Fuji Pro 400H

Fuji GS645 Portrait

Fuji GS645 Wedding Portrait

Devon with Contax 645

Hiding in the Forest

120 Kodak Ektar 100

Kodak Ektar RZ Portrait

Ektar Colours - Mamiya Engagement

Mamiya RZ Fashion

Mamiya RZ Fashion

Related Posts


Author: matthewosbornephotography

Coventry, UK studio based Model and Wedding Photographer offering both Medium Format Film and Digital Images. 1-2-1 Photography and Lighting Tuition also available.

3 thoughts on “Kodak Ektar vs Kodak Portra Film: Portraits”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s