1954 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5

1954 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5 – Example images & follow up review
(Link to original review below)

1954 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5

I have owned the Leica Summarit lens a few weeks now and have been using it for everything from Leica fashion beauty, portraiture, engagement shoots, landscapes, flowers and as a walk around lens. Here is a photo of my vintage silver Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5 on my vintage 1958 Leica M2 35mm film camera (taken with a Leica Summicron 90mm f2 on my Leica M9).

Camera Porn!

Example images using my 1954 Summarit 50/1.5 on my Leica M9
Street Portrait
Stop!
Retro Leica
London Fashion
Leica Summarit 50mm
Leica Engagement Shoot
Leica Engagement Shoot
Leica Summarit
Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5
Leica Summarit Bokeh
Leica Summarit 50/1.5
Vintage look landscape

How does the Leica Summarit compare to my other 50mm lenses?

I have 6+ 50mm lenses including Leica Summilux ASPH, Leica Summicron v5, Zeiss ZM Sonar and Zeiss ZM Planar. Despite owning all these ‘pedigree’ lenses I am finding myself chosing the vintage Leica Summarit first. Why? The Summarit has an amazing glow shot wide open at f1.5. It is sharp enough for female portraiture and I like the flare for my style of photography. The bokeh is like no other lens I own and together these traits give a photo a very unique and vintage look straight from the camera that I love.

Why does this lens have so many bad reviews?
This lens is prone to flare (as mentioned) due to the old lens coating applied when manufactured in the 1950s. The coating was soft so on many copies of this lens it is damaged. I was very lucky to buy my lens with the original Leica UV filter meaning the lens optics are in near mint condition. The lens is also known to suffer from focus shift and to be optimised at f2.8 rather than at f1.5. I have not noticed any problems shooting at f1.5 so I guess I got lucky here also. Lastly, older lenses can be prone to fogging but again my lens optics are clear so I have not experienced this problem.

One of my favourite lenses on my Nikon D800 is the 1970s manual focus Nikkor 50mm f1.2 AI-s. This lens also has an amazing glow shot wide open at f1.2 yet is easily sharp enough for portraiture.

I am very happy to have discovered this amazing old lens and I loved the vintage Leica look so much that I then bought a 1951 Leica Summaron 35mm f3.5. Full review on the Summaron to follow.

MatthewOsbornePhotography.co.uk – Leica Photographer

Related Posts
1954 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5https://matthewosbornephotography.wordpress.com/2014/04/01/leica-summarit-50mm-f1-5/
Leica Summaron 35mm f3.5https://matthewosbornephotography.wordpress.com/2014/04/13/leica-summaron-35mm-f3-5/

Advertisements

About matthewosbornephotography

Coventry, UK studio based Model and Wedding Photographer offering both Medium Format Film and Digital Images. 1-2-1 Photography and Lighting Tuition also available.
Image | This entry was posted in Leica and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to 1954 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5

  1. Reading this article inspired me to buy my own Leica Summarit last year. It made me believe that this often frowned up on lens could be good. Thanks for that, Mathew! By the way, I am a follower of yours on Flickr and really enjoy your stuff!

    Stopped down, I think that any shooter will appreciate the sharpness and separation with creamy bokeh that the 5cm 1.5 Summarit offers. But no, the flare and softness at full aperture are not typically what an available light shooter is looking for. I find that shooting in contrastier light with a contrasty, high accutance film/developer can really lend some help at 1.5 though. The crescent shaped out of focus points of light and slight swirlios really give this lens character that, for me, compensates for its shortcomings. I also enjoy the size and weight of this lens. It feels a bit heavy for my IIIc but fits great on my M6 TTL and finder blockage is minimal even with the original hood mounted. Despite the aperture ring rotating opposite my other Leica mount lenses, the positive feeling click stops are quite nice for the age of this lens. Admittedly, however, I switch to a modern 50/1.5 when I want that sharper, more glassy look at full aperture. Anyway, here are some of my results with the Leitz 50mm 1.5 Summarit. I hope that others become interested in giving this fun lens a second chance!

    © 2015 Johnny Martyr LeicaTriXSummaritLonesomeTree150_edited-1 Frederick Maryland Film Photographer
    • Hi Johnny, thanks! I agree with your findings and although I normally strive for ‘perfect’ images in terms of sharpness and contrast I have been testing a Petzval 85 Art lens on my old Nikon D800 and like the Summarit it is the imperfections that make the photos so special. Perhaps it is time to dig out the Summarit again 🙂

      Sorry your link didn’t work but thanks for the long message all the same. Thanks Matt

  2. Thanks, Matthew, for this post. Long story short – snagged a ’59 Summaron 35 2.8 at an estate sale for my Sony A7R2. Adapter fits the lens and camera perfectly – just not at the same time due to the goggles and grip blocking any closure. So, I’m contemplating taking the goggles off or trading/trading up to a ’54 of ’56 Summarit 50 1.5. This post (and Johnny’s post) is most helpful. Among other lens (with strong preference for my Sony Zeiss Distagon 35 1.4 and Zeiss Batis 85 1.8), I am presently enjoying a Nikon 50 1.4D and a Minolta Rokkor-X MD 50 1.4. The vintage bug has hit me but it seems like the Summarit could be used professionally based on your various posts. I welcome any thoughts on the choice and mainly wanted to say “thanks!” as this gives me confidence regarding the Summarit. Also following you on Flickr and have to confess preferring the Summarit to the Petzval but this is subjective, of course. One other comment: I’m writing a novel and was looking for a face… I spent 3 hours one winter afternoon searching and searching, then came up with a lovely smiling girl standing in an alley wearing a hat… B&W pic. This was Jan/Feb 2015. It’s how I first saw your work… for what it’s worth! (portrait website now under development so pardon anything after the first three tabs…efgimage.com)

    • Hi Scott, sorry for the delayed reply. I missed the notification. I’m trying to specifically see what questions you included in your post and I can confirm the Summarit can produce some of the best soft and dream bokeh images with a Leica if not shooting into bright light (flares easily). The Noctilux obviously does this type of look but at the same time is very different (and expensive). My M240 has needed recalibrating for a long time so I have not been shooting with fast lenses but I will dig out the lens and try to post some more recent work with it soon.

      The Petzval 85 Art lens is good.. in that it makes a Nikon D800 image look interested! 😛 This is a true statement as much as long in cheek. I think it is maybe similar to the Nikkor 50mm f1.2 AI-S lens that I used a huge amount when I shot Nikon. I will post a full Petzval 85 lens review as soon as I get chance.

      Good luck with your novel! Matt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s