Leica R6 vs Nikon FE2 Shootout (Kodak Vision3 500T Portraits) + YouTube
Have you ever wondered if the more expensive Leica R6 camera produces “better” (subjective I know!*) photos than the lower priced Nikon FE2 camera? I was interested for my own photography so I set about organising two model photo shoots where I could use both cameras side by side.
Camera Test Parameters
I wanted to keep as many variables as constant as possible to make the results more comparable. All images are shot by myself with my own equipment and I shot the photos one after each other so that the lighting would be constant. I asked the models to try to keep still and hold a similar pose and expression where possible (though it was a normal fun photoshoot so it was not set in stone)(It needs to be fun too!).
Leica R6 vs Nikon FE2- Test Criteria
- 50mm prime lens fitted on both cameras and all photos shot at f2 aperture
- No lens hood attached/ pulled out on either lens
- Both cameras had already been recently film tested by me
- Film in both cameras was exposed at ISO 200 (*Overexposed as expired film)
- Film for both cameras was spooled from the same bulk roll of Vision3 film
- All film processed/ developed in the same 3 reel Paterson tank
- Film negatives scanned with an Epson V800 scanner (flatbed) as TIF files
- Film scans processed through Adobe Lightroom and exported as small JPEG
- Images colour corrected + exposure / contrast adjustment in Lightroom
Two Camera Setup
- Leica R6 + Leica Summicron-R 50mm f2 v2 lens + Kodak Vision3 500T film
- Nikon FE2 + Nikkor 50mm f1.8 pancake v3 lens + Kodak Vision3 500T film
Leica R6 Review
Before reviewing the images, if you’ve never come across a Leica R6 SLR camera you may want to watch this Leica R6 review first –
Nikon FE2 Review
Equally if you are not up to speed on Nikon SLR cameras such as the Nikon FE2 you may enjoy this Nikon FE2 review as part of a broader camera comparison –
Kodak Vision3 500T Film (Motion Picture Film)
To better understand the process I went through to develop the film for this test, you might first need to understand more about the film that I used. All images were shot with expired bulk roll Kodak Vision3 500T motion picture film. First I had to spool the film to load into the 35mm cameras. Then once the film was developed I had to remove the remjet layer (see the video) before developing. I cross processed this ECN-2 film using my usual C-41 film chemistry as I the results work for me. As the film is expired, I exposed the ISo 500 speed film at ISo 200 to give me good exposure and shadow detail. (From my previous results this works well for my taste).
Leica SLR vs Nikon SLR Shootout – Images Compared
First I share pairs of similar images so you can compare the Leica R6 photos vs the Nikon FE2 photos. All images on the left are Leica R6 portraits, all images on the right are Nikon FE2 images.
Gallery – Leica R6 Portraits
As mentioned above, all Leica R6 portraits in this series were shot with a Leica Summicron-R 50mm f2 v2 lens at ISo 200 (In camera metering – I use the Leica R6 spot meter not matrix). The 50mm Summicron-R design has a built in slide out lens hood (which I didn’t use) and a recessed front lens element. Leica R lenses are said to render images warmer than their Leica M siblings. This seems to hold true from my results. Perhaps due to the lens design or lens coatings, I saw very little lens flare or loss of contrast in these images.
Nikon FE2 Portraits
The Nikon FE2 portraits were taken with the Nikkor 50mm f1.8 version 3 pancake lens, with no hood and the lens set at f2 for all images. The Nikkor glasses looks to give a cooler tone compared to the Leica Summicron-R 50mm f2 lens. This makes sense as the Leica R lenses are known to give a warmer look. Perhaps due to no lens hood and the lens design (a more exposed front lens element), the images seem to show more lens flare and less contrast verses the Leica images.
Leica R6 vs Nikon FE2 – Verdict?
I know I will state the obvious, but sometimes for us photography GAS sufferers I need to. Both cameras and lenses can take very nice photos and either setup is capable of making both you and the model (in this instance) very happy. The lens is what makes the image (+ the film) not the camera, but you need a camera that lets you focus and meter accurately to complete the task. Different lenses will transform the look of the final images even using the same camera body. Again stating the obvious. Let me break it down into two conclusions –
Leica R6 Performance – Conclusion
The Leica R6 is the more expensive camera with the more expensive lens so in theory you would expect it to perform better (based purely on cost)(“Better” is subjective so I expect the results to give mixed comments from readers). We know that cost is usually not directly proportional to performance but the lens showed better flare resistance and higher contrast. The Leica R6 camera lens setup is bigger and heavier than the Nikon with less camera functionality so that is worth noting too.
Nikon FE2 Performance – Conclusion
Despite calling myself MrLeica, I am a big fan of the Nikon FE2 camera too. I went out of my way to find the version 3 pancake lenses used in this test because of it’s performance and close focus ability. I feel Nikon SLR cameras offer exceptional value for money and the lenses available are almost endless. Being a smaller lighter camera-lens setup and lower value it is my ideal SLR setup for overseas photoshoots when I have to pack light.